The timers they are a-changin’

When my parents were visiting earlier this year, my Mum asked me why I don’t wear a watch any more.

“I just use my iPhone”, I explained.

“But don’t you miss having a watch?”

“No. Strapping a device to your wrist just to know the time seems as obsolete as, I dunno, strapping a barometer to your leg just to get the weather forecast”

“Oh don’t be such a clever so-and-so”

Since that exchange, however, I have noticed one advantage of watches: if you’re in a seminar or meeting that’s, shall we say, dragging a little, it’s much easier to surreptitiously glance at your watch than to check your phone (unless you always have your phone on the desk, display upwards and switched on, which I rarely do. Even if I do, it would still be easier to glance at my wrist without drawing attention to my actions).

Luckily, you don’t need to wear your own watch – anyone else’s that’s close and clear enough to check accurately will do. So hooray for the remaining watch-wearing luddites!

This thought led me to think of all the other devices my phone has rendered obsolete. Calculators, for one – I ordered one as part of my standard desk set-up when I started my last job in 2007, but didn’t bother when I started my current job in June; I hadn’t used my old one for years. In fact, my former boss and I were once sitting in a grant budget planning meeting, both crunching numbers on our iPhones, and joked that we should include new phones as a line item because they’re just so useful for so many science-related things.

Have smartphones also replaced laboratory timers? I would assume so, but I haven’t worked in a lab since 2005 so I really don’t know. I’m pretty sure that if I was still in my postdoctoral lab, I’d be using my phone in place of the banks of colour-coded timers that used to adorn every bench.

However, the story would be very different if I was still in my Glasgow lab.

Visiting my PhD supervisor’s office, which was right next to the lab, was always instructive but often dangerous. You’d go in to ask a simple yes-or-no question, and emerge in a daze two hours later (this is NOT an exaggeration) after a comprehensive grilling about your grasp of experimental design and the recent literature, your plans for the next phase of your projects, and anything else that took his fancy.

I soon learned to enter my supervisor’s office only if I had a laboratory timer, set to 5-10 minutes but on pause, in my pocket. If he started to go off on an unexpected tangent, I’d surreptitiously press the button that restarted the countdown through the fabric of my pocket, and would then make my escape when the timer beeped, mumbling something about a crucial next step in my protocol.

I confessed my use of this tactic to the lab’s other trainees in the pub one night, and learned that a few of them were already doing the same thing. The others started carrying a pre-set timer the very next day.

It would be much harder to pull this off if, instead of activating a hardware button on a timer, you had to somehow use a smartphone touch screen from within your pocket to restart the countdown.

So, as with watches in slow seminars, perhaps old-fashioned timers still serve a limited but extremely valuable purpose in science…

Posted in career, grant wrangling, personal, science, silliness, technology | 18 Comments

Useful resources for trainees

As part of my new role as the go-to person for everything related to my department’s trainees, I’ve put together a list of resources that I thought some readers might also find useful or interesting. The list is posted at GoogleDocs and includes websites, books and podcasts relating to the Canadian Common CV, proposal / thesis / manuscript writing, giving presentations, communicating with the public and the media, academic and other career advice, local events and organisations, etc – plus PhD Comics and assorted other time-wasters valuable insights into academic culture.

The list obviously has a local focus, but there are resources on the list that should appeal to people in other locations too.

If you know of any related resources I’ve missed, please add them in the comments of this post and I’ll include them in future versions of my list. This very much includes blog posts – I’ve included a few, but unfortunately my memory of blog posts I didn’t write is very short-term, and I know I’ve missed some excellent posts that deserve to be included. So don’t be shy about promoting your own posts!

Posted in career, communication, education, grant wrangling, publishing, science | 4 Comments

Wonderin’ Underground

Some of the signs I saw while riding the Montreal metro made me wonder just how safe the system is:

IMG_2920

Beware of gigantic creepy tickle monsters! 

IMG_2921

And also freaky parasitic alien pregnancies!

At least they’ve painted the parts of the platform that align with the train doors with a diagram of a suggested passenger flow system, a concept that sadly eludes most Vancouver commuters:

IMG_2923

(Many Vancouver commuters also don’t seem to be able to grasp the “stand right, walk left” concept. The thought “you’d get lynched for this in London” crosses my mind on a regular basis while using the SkyTrain).

However, the above welcome platform feature was cancelled out by this confusing element of Mr E Man’s hotel room:

IMG_2935

No doubt this is some fancy-pants French cooking concept I’m too unsophisticated to understand

Luckily the rest of the trip was fantastic, if too short (and too hot). We walked all over the city, ate fantastic food (including the obligatory smoked meat, some outstanding bagels, and the best Greek food I’ve ever had), visited the beautiful cathedral, and swam in the St. Lawrence. Mr E Man is going to be in Montreal for another 3-4 weeks, so saying goodbye to him was pretty tough, but time will pass in that way it always does and he’ll be home soon(ish)…

…assuming the gigantic creepy tickle monsters don’t get him first.

Posted in freakishness, photos, silliness, travel | 19 Comments

I’M SORRY!!!

This article suddenly made me feel just terrible about the many mutations I’ve introduced into all those poor genes and their promoters!

mutilation

 

Posted in bad people, English language, fun with language, science, screenshots, silliness | 8 Comments

Expat: a musical in three acts

Setting: Vancouver’s Commodore Ballroom

Act I: 54-40

(A whole room full of drunken Canadians is jumping up and down in ecstasy, singing along with every word of every song. Within the crowd is a group of friends, most of whom know each other from their time at a local high school. Most members of the group are also enthusiastically dancing and singing, but two women standing near the back look somewhat less enthused).

Expat Brit #1: “Is it just me, or is this a terrible concert?”

Expat Brit #2 (The Blogger): “It’s not just you. The sound’s awful! I didn’t even know you could get bad sound at the Commodore!”

EB#1: “I KNOW! Have you recognised any songs yet?”

The Blogger: “I knew that “I go blind” one, because a cover version of it was on the Friends soundtrack”

EB#1: “Oh, is that where I know it from?!”

The Blogger: “Oh well, at least the real Canadians are having fun”

EB#1’s Canadian husband: “ISN’T THIS AWESOME??!!”

EPB#1 and The Blogger: “Oh, yeah.”

http://youtu.be/fMZSSVt355I

Act II: Gomez

(The venue is less full than in Act I, although many people are just as enthusiastic and almost as drunk. Within the crowd is a group of friends, most of whom know each other from their time at a local high school. Most members of the group are dancing a little bit, and singing along with a few of the songs. However, one woman dancing away at the front of the group is clearly much more enthused, and is singing her heart out to every song).

EPB#1’s Canadian husband: “I don’t know this one!”

The Blogger: “It’s from their first album! I remember dancing to this in the student union the year I graduated!”

EPB#1’s Canadian husband: “That’s nice. I’m going to the bar. Want anything?”

Act III: Franz Ferdinand

(The venue is packed. Within the crowd is a group of friends, most of whom know each other from their time at a local high school. All of them know the same songs, and are singing and dancing away. The sound is kinda shitty again, but this time no-one cares).

Everyone: “TAKE ME OUT! ULYSSES! YEAH! THIS IS AWESOME!”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These three concerts sum up the expat experience perfectly. Whether you’re talking about music, TV, other aspects of pop culture, politics, sport, history, or almost any other subject, you just don’t share the formative experiences, the foundational knowledge, of most of your friends…

…and they don’t share yours.

You stand absolutely no chance of winning a trivia quiz in either your native or your adopted country.

However, if you have the right group of friends, you get to mix and match and share your knowledge and experiences. Sometimes you’ll each think the other group members’ great musical or other loves from their past are super-lame… but sometimes you’ll enjoy yourself immensely as your friends relive their younger days, even if you don’t know all the words to all the songs.

And you get to form new, truly shared experiences. Like when a new band comes along, from any country, and you all get into them at the same time.

I still miss my old friends, and wonder what new experiences they’ve been sharing without me. We’ll always have Paris the Newcastle student union Bassment club on a Friday night, though, to which the Commodore is superior in almost every way, especially the state of the loos.

They really do need to sort out their sound, though.

Next concert: ROXETTE! I am ridiculously excited.

Posted in Canada, embarrassing fan girl, music, personal, UK, Uncategorized, Vancouver, videos | 23 Comments

MIRABILIS!

I just received a package from home:

IMG_2899

Yeah. Some of these are going up next to my desk at work.

Unfortunately, my parents’ local post office was all sold out of Jessica’s stamp, though…

Posted in embarrassing fan girl, family, photos, silliness, sport, UK | 12 Comments

What’s in a name?: towards the development of a novel analysis of grant titles

A couple of weeks ago, I blogged about how I’m going to be responsible for helping all trainees in my new department identify, apply for, and manage their awards (comment on my post, you bastards please!). I’ve spent some time since then exporting all trainee award entries in our comprehensive grants database – which contains every funding application of any kind submitted by anyone affiliated with our department since before 2007 – into an Excel spreadsheet for ease of analysis. While I was engaged in this thrilling necessary exercise, I spotted some patterns in the first few words of the grant titles (the field by which all database entries are sorted by default). I therefore spent some time last night (hooray for VPN!) doing a quick-and-dirty analysis* of all database entries (i.e. not just the trainee awards) by status (successful, unsuccessful, pending), and pulled out all title first words that showed up more than once in any category.

I ignored excessively field-specific words (a lot of our grants start with Genomic / Genetic / Molecular / Personalised etc.), and lumped different forms of the same word together – so, for example, all grants starting with “The evaluation of”, “Evaluation of”, and “Evaluating” are grouped together as “Evaluation”.

Here

is

some

padding

text

so

people

who

want

to

guess

which

title

first

words

are

the

most

common

don’t

accidentally

see

the

graph

before

they’re

ready.

NB there are ~25% more unsuccessful than successful grants in the database**, with a much smaller number of pending applications.

 

grant titles

Some unique entries that caught my eye:

  • Concerted (successful)
  • Deciphering (successful)
  • INTERROGATION (yes, in all caps – unsuccessful)
  • Multidisciplinary (unsuccessful)
  • Seeking (unsuccessful. Maybe they should have used Desperately Seeking?)
  • Stratifying (successful)
  • Unraveling (unsuccessful)

I’d be interested to see how this analysis varies by field and country…

Do you have a favoured first word or more general structure for your grant application titles?

Do you think it’s better to stand out with a unique title, or to use a more standard title structure?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*no grants in the database start with the words “Quick-and-dirty analysis”, sadly.

**this isn’t an accurate reflection of the overall success rate as there may have been some selective backfilling of pre-2007 grants. The rate is getting more and more accurate over time though, as every grant is now captured.

Posted in career, English language, fun with language, grant wrangling, science | 23 Comments

Be careful what you wish for…

…because you might just get it.

I wished for Mr E Man to get a job, after a couple of months in which the local movie industry was as quiet as Stephen Harper’s conscience and two non-movie job offers both fell through amid a confusing haze of vague job descriptions, constantly pushed-back start-dates, and – ultimately – unreturned phone calls.

I wished for some time to myself after a combination of Mr E Man’s unemployment, a new job, and my parents’ visit completely disrupted my pre-work, work, and post-work routines, respectively, for a couple of months and I never had the house to myself for more than a few minutes at a time.

Well, the local transit authority must have taken over the movie industry, because three job offers came along at once. Two were for TV shows (which pay less than movies) that weren’t starting for another couple of weeks, would only last two or three weeks each, and were likely to feature five short days of work per week. The third was for a movie at the full feature rate of pay, oodles of long day and weekend overtime, for at least four weeks…

…in Montreal.

(There’s also free accommodation in a rather nice hotel with two swimming pools, and a very generous per diem payment that more than covers all the food and drink crew members could possibly hope to have time to consume during the approximately 3.5 waking hours per week in which they will not be working. But still – Montreal. Booooo).

He found out about the job last Thursday, and was on a plane first thing Monday morning. On Tuesday he started to hear rumours about the job lasting more like six weeks than four – or possibly even longer.

This is not quite what I had in mind.

Ah well, it could be worse. Last time he worked away from home for four weeks it was worse in many ways: no kittehs to keep me company, no Skype, a smaller group of friends (because I hadn’t been here as long), no online blog / Twitter community to chat with, and we were living in a baking hot apartment that was simply miserable to be in during the summer*. There was one long weekend where literally every single local friend was out of town on non-crashable family or romantic trips, I had horrible menstrual cramps, and just sat hunched up on the sofa in front of the fan and chugging ibuprofen for three days, feeling like the world’s biggest loser. This time will definitely not be anywhere near as bad as that.

On the other hand, Mr E Man is more than 3,600 km and four hours flight time further away than he was last time, when I visited him in Victoria for a weekend and he came back to Vancouver for one night (his friend’s wedding). I was just in Montreal myself, and it’s a hell of a long way to go for a short visit – Canada is HUGE and Montreal is almost the full width of the country away from Vancouver. When the job was going to be four weeks long, I wasn’t planning to visit at all; however, a six week stint would mean being apart from Mr E Man on our anniversary and his birthday for the second year in a row**. I did have some good news on this front today: I’d originally thought that, as a new employee, I couldn’t take any vacation days for my first few months, but it turns out that this doesn’t apply to people like me who’ve transferred in from other departments within the same institution. Vacation time is accrued in some weird kind of back-dated way such that you don’t accrue any time off for your first few months, but there’s no restriction on when you can take your days off if you actually have some available, which I do. (This is why you ask HR instead of just relying on everyone’s assumptions). So I might head out there for an extra-long weekend if the job gets extended past four weeks…

…which we would probably find out about on the final day of the fourth week.

I’ve been with Mr E Man for almost ten years, and I still can’t get used to how the movie industry works. Boom and bust, weeks and weeks of no jobs followed by multiple offers of 13-hours-a-day-six-days-a-week frenzies, vague predictions of shows starting “some time in the next few weeks” that then get pushed back multiple times followed by panicked phone calls asking if you can start tomorrow… it’s even more chaotic than academia during grant season.

Oh well. It’s not so bad. As always during the first week of solitude, I’m quite enjoying the me-time – not to mention being back in my usual pre-work routine of listening to podcasts instead of watching the stupid local TV news channel Mr E Man prefers, talking to the cats without ridicule, and dancing to cheesy music while I get ready for work. I’ve been out after work once this week already, and have a few other fun times with friends planned for this weekend and beyond. As soon as I get used to sleeping sans snoring again (right now, in the absence of the usual in-room noise, it feels like I can hear every single sound anyone makes within a four block radius, so it takes me ages to get to sleep), and assuming I can arrange fun times for every Saturday night (at a minimum), I should be all set.

This movie‘d better be good, though!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*It had massive ceiling skylights that let in ALL THE SUNSHINE ALL THE TIME but no air, was too close to the ground in too dodgy an area to leave the other windows open while we weren’t home, and was directly above the ovens of the pizza restaurant on the ground floor. Great in winter – we barely spent any money on heating – but MISERABLE for a few weeks every summer (no-one has air conditioning in Vancouver because you really do only need it for a few days a year. Assuming, that is, that you live in a normal dwelling as opposed to a skylit pizza oven). We ran the fan on maximum speed pointing directly at the bed all night, kept a spray bottle of water by the bed to spray ourselves with every hour or so, and still couldn’t sleep. We ate breakfast and dinner in a nearby park every day, and spent as little time in the flat as humanly possible.

**Last year he was on his way to and then at Burning Man. I originally told Mr E Man that if he missed our anniversary again I would start adopting an additional cat every day until he returns. But 16 cats is a few too many, even for me.

Posted in first world problems, furry friends, personal, rants, whining | 14 Comments

Ask The Blogosphere – how can we help trainees with their studentship & fellowship applications?

I mentioned in a recent post that part of my job is going to involve specialising in something that I’d previously listed as a long-term career goal. As you’ve probably already guessed from this post’s title, I’m now ready (with permission from above!) to not only tell you what I’m up to, but also to ask for your crowdsourcing help with it!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In my last position, I always found helping trainees with their studentship and fellowship applications to be one of the most rewarding parts of the job. As I’ve mentioned, I always felt the most useful when helping the people who have the least experience in preparing grant applications, and less useful when helping the experienced senior PIs. And that’s what I get to specialise in – my new department has been looking for someone to act as a centralised point person to help trainees identify, apply for, and manage their own awards. I am soooooooo excited!

I really just started thinking seriously about this initiative on Monday, having spent almost all my time so far getting up to speed on the main project I’m managing and learning new processes, software, and science. Before I can really start talking to the trainees about what they need, I have some admin tasks to complete: I need to convert the current tracking system from a partially paper to a fully electronic format; help compile an updated list of trainees and their home institutions/departments*; populate the trainee section of the internal website with lists of upcoming awards, forms, processes, contact information, writing courses, timelines for getting PI CVs and internal signatures, and other important information; update the trainee-specific application cover sheet; contact the relevant people in three different offices of research services*; etc.

Once I’m done with all that I’m going to put together a focus group consisting of current trainees who’ve already submitted at least one application, to find out what information and support from PIs and other staff they found useful and – more importantly – what information and support they didn’t get that, with hindsight, could have helped them. The plan is to identify best practices from different labs that can be combined into improved centralised resources and processes, for which I will be responsible (the PIs will obviously still be responsible for mentoring their own trainees in proposal writing; the idea is to help both the trainees and the PIs with the other aspects of the process).

Before convening the focus group, I’d love to hear from my readers about their own experiences. I’ll use the examples you give (as well as my own experiences) as prompts if the trainees I talk to have a hard time defining specifics, and will also put them into the pool of examples from which to identify current best practices (although local needs and preferences will be given priority).

So:

TRAINEES (current and former): what information and support are/were you given when applying for studentships, fellowships, and other awards? Which did you find the most useful, and which do you wish you’d had that weren’t offered?

PIs: what information and support do you offer your own trainees when they apply for studentships, fellowships, and other awards? What feedback have you had from your trainees, and how did your process evolve?

Any other nuggets of information you wish to provide would be most welcome!

Thanks in advance 🙂

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*We’re a non-university research institution, but are affiliated to two local universities; the PIs are all alsoprofessors at one of those institutions, in various departments, and their students are enrolled in their supervisor’s university department.

Posted in career, education, grant wrangling, science | 13 Comments

Progress!

I just made a to-do list for next week that contains:

  • more instances of “follow up with X about Y”;
  • more entries that start with the words “organise”, “set up”, or “finalise”;
  • many more acronyms (and initials instead of full names of colleagues / collaborators);
  • fewer entries that start with the words “look up”, “find out about”, “learn how to”, or “arrange access to”; and
  • far, far fewer entries that include the words “thingy” or “stuff”

than any other weekly to-do list I’ve made since switching jobs!

I’m obviously getting on top of things. Yay!

On my weekend to-do list: a meet-up with Alyssa tonight, then an overnight camping trip on Saturday / Sunday to celebrate two friends’ 40th birthdays (during which we get to test our brand new tent for the first time). Yay again!

Posted in blog buddies, camping, career, silliness | 5 Comments