-
Recent Posts
- Brief Book Review: Lessons in Chemistry–a novel by Bonnie Garmus
- Persistence: the essence of science in a nutshell
- It’s out! Today’s Curiosity is Tomorrow’s Cure
- Corner Office
- Introducing Golgi, the Labrador Retriever
- Today’s Curiosity is Tomorrow’s Cure: The Case for Basic Biomedical Research
- A wonderful life
- A perfect experiment and the poop factor
- In the shadow of the great narcissist
- Preliminary lessons from a global pandemic
- The Coronaviral lie detector
- Does it pass the smell-test? Review of “The DNA of you and me”
- The changing face of science
- Important Takeaways from “The Discovery of Insulin” for Today’s Scientists
- Lost and Wanted—A review of a new LabLit novel
- The Renaissance and Preformation
- Life lessons learned–from others’ mistakes…
- How far should students go in striving for professionalism?
- How *NOT* to deliver a seminar
- Reinventing the Wheel
Blogroll
NO COMMENT–Comments
- Henry Gee on Brief Book Review: Lessons in Chemistry–a novel by Bonnie Garmus
- Steve Caplan on Introducing Golgi, the Labrador Retriever
- Steve Caplan on Introducing Golgi, the Labrador Retriever
- Henry on Introducing Golgi, the Labrador Retriever
- Henry on A wonderful life
- Steve Caplan on Important Takeaways from “The Discovery of Insulin” for Today’s Scientists
- Elizabeth Bliss on Important Takeaways from “The Discovery of Insulin” for Today’s Scientists
- Laurence Cox on The Renaissance and Preformation
- steve on How *NOT* to deliver a seminar
- Steve on How *NOT* to deliver a seminar
- Richard Wintle on How *NOT* to deliver a seminar
- Laurence Cox on How *NOT* to deliver a seminar
- Jennifer Rohn on UGG: The Undergraduate Guide for Graduate School
- Jake Bryan on The best experiment
- Vivien Dwyer on Another school shooting–will anything change?
- A Caplan on A danger to science and so much more
- Fed up on Diversity skips African Americans in science
- Steve Caplan on Even a blind squirrel sometimes finds a nut—or does he?!
- Laurence Cox on Even a blind squirrel sometimes finds a nut—or does he?!
- Laurence Cox on Even a blind squirrel sometimes finds a nut—or does he?!
Archives
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (1)
- July 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (1)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (3)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (3)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (6)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (7)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (10)
- June 2011 (6)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (8)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (10)
- January 2011 (16)
- December 2010 (3)
Categories and Topics
- academic boycott (3)
- Education (77)
- education (1)
- Guest posts (2)
- humor (68)
- research (180)
- Reviews (6)
- science (223)
- Uncategorized (97)
Meta
Blogroll
Looking for something?
I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now…
- anti-semitism
- author
- authors
- books
- career
- cell biology
- creativity
- dogs
- education
- feminism
- funding
- grant
- grants
- Israel
- journals
- lab
- lab lit
- Lablit
- laboratory
- mentor
- Nebraska
- NIH
- novel
- novels
- omaha
- papers
- peer review
- Ph.D.
- PI
- post-doc
- postdoc
- president
- principal investigator
- religion
- research
- science
- scientist
- scientists
- silliness
- student
- students
- Trump
- truth
- US
- vizsla
LabLit
- Our serial continues: 'The institute' by Richard P. Grant July 23, 2020Part 7 of 'Momentary Lapse of Reason' by Richard P. Grant
- The Magnafan by Luke and Declan July 4, 2020Our Young Authors series continues!
- You can run but you can't hide: The Ghost of Cells Past, Part 4 June 7, 2020Our 4-part story by Deborah Flusberg concludes!
- Scoops and retractions: our serial 'Momentary Lapse' continues! May 24, 2020Part 6 of 'Momentary Lapse of Reason' by Richard P. Grant
- He is obsessed with her, but can he escape?... our latest serial continues April 7, 2020The ghost of cells past, by Deborah Flusberg
- Our serial continues: 'The institute' by Richard P. Grant July 23, 2020
HOW TO FIND ME?
e-mail me at: scaplan[at]unmc.eduSteve on Twitter
Follow me on TWITTER: @caplansteveSee my personal website and reviews of my first novel, “Matter Over Mind”
http://www.stevecaplan.netSteve’s science website
http://www.unmc.edu/biochemistry/index.cfm?conref=3Facebook
Tag Archives: peer review
Even scientists have birthdays
What do you get for a scientist who has everything? Except, perhaps, all the grants and papers he wants….
Posted in humor, Reviews, science
Tagged Birthdays, grants, manuscripts, peer review, research, scientists
Comments Off on Even scientists have birthdays
Why we need to better educate the public about science–and stop bill “S. 1973, The Basic Research Act”
The 20th and 21st centuries have arguably been the “Golden Age” for science in the US and other developed countries. Within a generation we have gone from people routinely dying as a result of simple bacterial infections to the power … Continue reading
Posted in Education, research, science
Tagged bill S. 1973, biomedical research, CRISP/Cas9, Darwin, enzymes, funding, grant review, medical advances, National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, NIH, NSF, peer review, Rand Paul, research, science, taxpayer advocate, The Basic research Act, vaccinations
Comments Off on Why we need to better educate the public about science–and stop bill “S. 1973, The Basic Research Act”
Paying for peer review? No thanks, I’m outta here…
I spent Friday traveling west of Omaha to the University of Nebraska at Kearney, in of course, Kearney, Nebraska–about 3 hours west of Omaha. The University of Nebraska has 4 major campuses: 1) The University of Nebraska Medical Center (where … Continue reading
Posted in research, science
Tagged compensation, editor, editorial board, editors, journals, nature, peer review, publishing, review, rubriq, science, scientific reports
6 Comments
Call for Papers?
A few days ago I received an email from “The American International Journal of Contemporary Research“–now there’s an oxymoronic journal title: American International. Make up your minds! Apparently, this journal is not good at ‘making up its mind,’ as the … Continue reading
Posted in humor, research, science
Tagged American-International, broad-specific, fed up with BS, get serious, journals, oxymoron, papers, peer review, pretend peer review, science, scope
10 Comments
Are scientists becoming an endangered species? The way we live–now
What spurred me to put pen-to-paper, if that phrase has any remaining meaning, was reading about the recent proposals at the US National Institutes of Health to again revamp the grant review system. The previous revamp, just several years ago, … Continue reading
Posted in research, science
Tagged endangered species, grant review, grants, peer review, reviews, science, scientists, survival, the way we live now
10 Comments
In defense of journal hierarchy
Plagued with an unbelievably busy schedule, I have been a mostly passive follower of the excellent dialog that has resulted from several outstanding blogs on the peer review system, many of them “high impact blogs” by my esteemed colleague, Dr. … Continue reading
Posted in research, science
Tagged high tier, impact factor, journals, papers, peer review, science
32 Comments
However…
Have you ever had a manuscript was accepted unconditionally without any revisions? In speaking with many scientists, it turns out that this seems to be a once in a lifetime phenomenon. Indeed, it has happened to me but once. A … Continue reading
Posted in research, science
Tagged critiques, editorial board, manuscripts, Nablus, papers, peer review, reviews, science journals, supplemental data
18 Comments
Peer review and the “ole boys network”
A lot has been said about peer review, recently by Frank here, here and here, by Richard here, here and here, by Sylvia and by others. So what more can I add? Like democracy, it’s not ideal, but compared the … Continue reading
Announcing: the first documented Occam’s Typewriter scientific collaboration
I am very pleased to announce–after many months of work, revisions, and re-revisions–(to the best of my knowledge) the first scientific collaboration born out of Occam’s Typewriter. After all, in addition to all the peripheral fun of being a scientist … Continue reading
Posted in research, science
Tagged collaboration, journal, peer review, publication, revisions
19 Comments
There is peer review, and then there is this…
Dear Dr. Steve Caplan It is because of good wishes and blessings of scientists, editorial board members and well wishers like you, the Journal of Chemical Engineering & Process Technology has now got International reputation. With your support, Journal of … Continue reading