My guilt from the sidelines

Like a moth drawn to the fire, I can’t stop myself. And I warn the reader that this blog doea not have anything directly to do with science, or life in science–although it does have to do with life. And equality. Or a lack of it.

I moved to Israel in 1983. I was recruited to the military, and after some time, I thought to myself “If I ever get out of this uniform, everything will be okay. For anyone who survives the military, living in Israel should be ‘a piece of cake.'”

Then I realized there were reserve drafts, and I hated this as well. Within 10 years, I was able to get discharged (I’ll leave the circumstances purposefully enigmatic)–and I thought that from then on, life would be easy.

I was wrong. Among all the great achievements in Israel, scientific and otherwise, there remains a growing sense that medieval forces are taking over the country. That equality is being rejected. On various fronts.

Recently, some of us were grappling with the issue of how to leave a legacy–or lasting impact. Well, I am again appending an article written in the Israel daily “Yediot” by one woman who has made a lasting and lifelong impact. Her name is Shulamit Aloni, and she was the head of one of Israel’s political parties devoted to human rights, freedom, equality, tolerance and much more. She was Israel’s very best Education Minister for a time as part of a coalition years ago. She is a tireless fighter for the right’s of women and for freedom against religious coercion.

As I read this little article that Shulamit wrote, I could feel my guilt at abandoning her to the struggle. But I do not want my own daughter helplessly stuck in this atmosphere.

Judaism against women

Op-ed: We must fight Jewish radicalization, which views women as lesser human beings

Shulamit Aloni

Last month, Anat Hoffman of the Reform Movement (a non-orthodox and tolerant religious movement that has equality for women and is shunned by the orthodox in Israel-SC) proposed that I board one of the previously gender-segregated bus lines and examine the attitude to women. These are the bus routes where the High Court of Justice ruled such segregation is illegal and must be annulled (the orthodox believe women and men need to be segregated on buses, in lines, everywhere-SC).

I boarded the Route 418 bus from Ramat Beit Shemesh to Jerusalem. The bus was full, and I, an elderly woman over 80 years of age, sought a seat. The men did not appear ill to me yet nobody offered his seat (hardly surprising-SC).

I finally found a free seat at the front of the bus. I sat down and immediately heard someone yelling: “Women to the back of the bus.” They screamed but I smiled and continued to sit. Emotions were high but eventually the bus driver said: “Stop it. Let her sit wherever she wants.”

This segregation is disgusting. It is a shame that the Egged bus company cooperates with this for some profits. However, the problem is not Egged. After all, Egged is subsidized by the State and must serve the entire public, regardless of ethnicity, creed, religion or gender.

We are currently experiencing the revival of radical, zealous rabbis who seek to elicit power. They challenge the government and Knesset, brainwash their students and present themselves as an alternative: The rule of the Torah (the Bible-SC). This radicalization is fed by money, political power and the weakness of ministers and Knesset members who seek to curry favor with the religious public.

This is not a new phenomenon. It started when politicians began to make pilgrimages to rabbis.

Judaism never espoused the need to distance from women. After all, God created both man and woman in his own image. The segregation we are witnessing is the producing of prejudice and power struggles.

A crazy country

I learned from various rabbis, such as Shlomo Goren, who followed historical precedents of a “conditional divorce” to prevent women from becoming Agunot (A woman who cannot remarry for religious reasons-SC). Together we managed to prevent injustices done to many women. Rabbi Shmuel Avidor Hacohen was also a special man, and when I approached him with the problems of couples who could not get married he spared no effort and smoothed over the issues elegantly.

I meet successful women at the highest level of every field. I admire their rational, practical devotion to the targets they pursue. I also view the women of Kolech, Israel’s first Orthodox feminist organization, as wise, educated and incredibly clever. Yet I feel that we live in a crazy country. Everyone woos women but they are not given rights. We want them to be pretty, healthy and make a living – yet we also want them to shut up. Only few appreciate and truly care for their rights.

The Israeli public has tired of struggles for changing legislation for the sake of human rights. Yet now of all times – when winds of change are blowing and people are enlisting to the cause of a more dignified life for all of us – we must not forget the notion of equality for the entire population. We must care for others, allow every group and individual to express themselves, and respect each other.

We are persecuted by people who are supposed to be men of letters who honor every human being. So I have news for them: A woman is a human being too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

Now I Can Retire: the measure of all things

Generally speaking, scientists do not appear to be happy people. And by scientists, I refer to those actively doing research at academic institutions. No hard feelings for those who are not–I have no experience with industry, and my impression is that others in science-related fields (but not active research) appear somewhat more relaxed–yes, perhaps even happier.

For this reason, it’s all the more important for scientists today to stop, smell the flowers formaldehyde once in awhile, and celebrate various accomplishments. A graduate student’s first paper, receiving a fellowship, graduating, being accepted to a good lab for post-doc studies, more papers, more fellowships, a good job, an academic tenure-track position, success in running a new lab, the first independent papers as a PI, receiving independent grant funding, tenure, being chosen for important committees, teaching successfully, having students vie to rotate and be in your lab.

Where does it end? For some, it may be a Nobel prize. But they are few and far-in-between, even for those whose research is regarded as stellar. Is it peer-accorded respect? The invitation to deliver seminars at other institutes? To be asked to review grants and papers? Being selected as an editorial board member? Or does it become the desire to be a National Academy of Science Member? Or just to get one’s name in such exclusive journals as Cell, Science and Henry’s thing-a-ma-jib with the letter N?

During the course of a recent party at my house in honor of a just-graduated student who was moving on to a post-doc position, I was able to disengage from the crowd and think about some of those difficult questions for an aspiring scientist–when would I happily retire (when I get to that age, of course–although it’s not that far away)–what would I need to be able to say about myself?

Well aside from the regular yada-yada about what my specific contributions are in membrane trafficking–the field that I work in and love–surprisingly, the answer came to me fairly quickly.

One of the enjoyable things about the party was the chance to visit with a former student who graduated a couple years ago from the lab and is currently concluding a relatively short post-doctoral stint at Harvard. One of the reasons for her return to our venerable town–aside from coming to congratulate her former student colleague on her graduation–was to say good-bye. She received a much coveted Assistant-Professor tenure-track position from a new and somewhat “westernized” institute in India. These are extremely difficult to come by, as there are massive numbers of highly qualified and successful Indian scientists applying for these positions.

Well, perhaps this is it. No matter what course my research and career takes from now on (and hopefully I will be satisfied with it), this may be the answer I have been seeking. I have served my “scientific-evolutionary-purpose” by passing on my tools and trade to the next generation. Perhaps that is the measure of all things.

Posted in Education, research, science | Tagged , , , | 14 Comments

Science Education Then and Now

I can still vividly remember being taught lab safety in 7th or 8th grade chemistry at school. The old way: being given a long list of rules, reading them and being tested on them. No eating, drinking, chewing gum etc. etc. Many of the same rules apply in my lab at the university.

What’s changed? The way the rules are being taught in school-and for the better!

Here’s a video made by a group of kids (including my daughter) to creatively address safety skills in physical science labs, with the text given below:

Credits to the cameraman, my 9 y old son.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W4u9RX31Xg

Our science project about safety skills.

Lyrics:

Mr. Erixon- Good afternoon!

Naomi, Mika, and Katie- Good afternoon, Mr. Erixon.

Mr. Erixon- Is everyone excited for the acid test that could burn holes through your hands if you aren’t prepared? Are you guys prepared?

Naomi, Mika, and Katie- Yes, Mr. Erixon.

Mr. Erixon- I think not! I mean look at you, Katie, you have way too much hair- it’s going to get burned off.

Mika- But I think it’s pretty…..

Mr. Erixon- I don’t care. And then Mika, with all of your jewelry, you know, it’s going to just…kill you! Then Naomi….Na-Naomi!

Naomi- Wha-what?

Mr. Erixon- You’re sagging really bad, did you go gangsta or something?

Naomi- What? I like the style- don’t judge me!

Mr. Erixon- You know, I could punish you for this, and our fellow viewer, but for the viewers, I’m going to punish you in a different way. Hit it, Gaga!

Ohhh…..I want those safety skills x2

Rah rah ah ah ah ah
Roma roma mah mah
Gaga ooh la la
I want those safety skills x2

I want those skills, I want them bad,
I want those safety skills, I’m going mad, I want those skills.
Skills, skills, skills, I want those skills.
My science teacher tells me not to wear jewels.
He also tells me no baggy clothes, no baggy clothes.
Clothes, clothes, clothes, no baggy clothes.

You know that I want them.
And you know that I need them.
I want to be safe,
Safety skills

I want those safety skills, I want them bad, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah……..
I want those safety skills so I won’t be had, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah…….. I want those safety skills x2

Rah rah ah ah ah ah
Roma roma mah mah
Gaga ooh la la
I want those safety skills

If you spill something, don’t wipe it off,
Tell a teacher to clean it up, clean it up.
Up, up, up, clean it up.

Make sure you wave your hand over the flask,
‘Cause chemicals can smell really bad, they smell bad
Bad, bad, bad, they smell bad.

You know that I want them.
And you know that I need them.
I want to be safe,
Safety skills

I want those safety skills, I want them bad, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah……..
I want those safety skills so I won’t be had, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah…….. I want those safety skills x2

Rah rah ah ah ah ah
Roma roma mah mah
Gaga ooh la la
I want those safety skills x2

Walk, walk, don’t run, baby, or you’ll make that teacher crazy….
Walk, walk, don’t run, baby, or you’ll make that teacher crazy….
Walk, walk, don’t run, baby, or you’ll make that teacher crazy….
Walk, walk, don’t run, baby, I’m a free nerd, baby!
No adult supervision means you can’t start a lab,
Caution is need when working with acids……

MUSICAL BREAK

Katie- Who is that person in the video? So ugly!

Mika- I know, right?

Katie- Oh my god, put on some Justin Bieber!

Mika- Justin Bieber! Oh my god, who are you texting, Naomi?

Naomi- No one you know.

Katie- Well I think I know everybody…

Naomi- This video is horrible, but you guys are like, annoying.

Mika- Anyways,

Katie- What’s up with this video?

I want those safety skills, I want them bad, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah……..
I want those safety skills so I won’t be had, you know I want those safety skills,
Woah woah woah…….. I want those safety skills x2

Rah rah ah ah ah ah
Roma roma mah mah
Gaga ooh la la
I want those safety skills

Naomi, Mika, and Katie- I want those safety skills!

Mika- Wow, that was like, like, like, like amazing!

Katie- Yeah, I didn’t know you knew Gaga!

Mr. Erixon- Me neither!

Silence…..
Naomi- Dude, we all really learned something.

Mr. Erixon- And what did you learn?

Mika- Not to wear bling?

Naomi- Not to sag, even though it looks awesome.

Katie- Not to have long hair down during labs?

Mr. Erixon- You are all wrong. Lady Gaga is weird.

All- Yeah, I guess.

Mr. Erixon- Well, goodbye, children!

Naomi- I didn’t get my afternoon nap today! Today was weird.

Mika and Katie- You said it!

Posted in Education, humor, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Science Education Then and Now

One morning, the phone in the lab rings

Revenge can be sweet. It doesn’t have to be for anything really bad, or serious. Sometimes it tastes just as good in answer to a bit of attitude, some haughtiness, someone getting too big for his/her britches. Or in this case, when a recently graduated student invited dozens of people “over” for a good-bye party (to be held this upcoming week). To my house.

What does one do when your former student is “out of control” and still working in the lab for another few weeks? This one isn’t in any “How to run a lab” manual that I encountered. The key is to get the person back to a basic level of humility–to remove the manic “I am super-person” that sometimes emerges with the title “Dr.” for some (former) students.

My solution? A little prank. First, I wrote a short and plausible little script. I should have been working on my grant and rewriting 3-4 papers for submission/resubmission–but there are priorities.

Then, a conversation with a trusted lab member (whose identity shall remain anonymous to protect him/her).Then, the  identification of an amateur but extremely capable actor willing to take part–and voila, the ingredients are there.

I arranged to be in the lab and talking to people when the former student was positioned in front of the computer in the lab. All systems go. Text messages transmitted, and seconds later the phone rings. Here is an approximation of the conversation that occurred:

First, “Are you answering the phone?”

“I’ve got it”

“Hello, may I speak with Dr. XXX? (the script had the actor read the former student’s first name after the Dr.)

“That’s me.”

“My name is Kenneth Fowler (couldn’t resist, as in FOUL), and I’m an administrator in the Dept. of Blah Blah at the University of West Coast (these were the real names of the department that the said former student is going for post-doctoral studies in 2 weeks time). I’m also serving as an arbitrary auditor for the department’s economic outlook program.”

“Uhh huh.”

“I’m afraid I have some rather unfortunate news for you that Dr. ZZZ has asked me to pass along to you. He’s tied up in departmental economic auditing meetings all week, but he wanted to make sure that I contact you as soon as possible.”

[In the meantime, those in the lab who were in the know were glancing at one another, trying hard not to crack up. I was half listening to one end of the conversation, and pretending to look at blots that a post-doc who was not in the loop was showing me. I did not want her to be upset that I wasn’t taking her results seriously, but was having trouble multi-tasking]

“Dr. ZZZhas asked me to inform you that rather than beginning in early Sept., he will not be able to accommodate a start date for you until Nov. 15th.”

Stunned silence. A few feelings of guilt moved into my gut, along with the adrenalin of the prank.

“But I already rented an apartment and am scheduled to come out in 10 days? How can this be? We already arranged the paperwork and everything?”

“I apologize on behalf of the department and Dr. ZZZ. You surely know how things are right now economically. The audit report clearly has limited Dr. ZZZ from hiring you before Nov. 15th. Perhaps you could ask your current mentor if he could keep you on until November.”

[In the background, I am saying to someone: ‘It’s fortunate that YYY is leaving next week, because otherwise I wouldn’t have a budget for this coming year… Sometimes the icing on the cake can be a bit cruel]

The conversation went on a few more minutes, with a weak argument from the student, and the actor doing a magnificent job apologizing, rebutting and telling the former student that the PI could not do anything about it and that he was busy. Finally, the call ended with the student staring blankly in front of the computer screen.

At the urging of one of my co-conspirators in the lab, it was time to end the prank. But I was having such a good time! Just a few more humbling minutes! To hear some groveling, about staying on for an extra few months. That would end any more “big for your britches” phenotype.

But no, alas, I am a soft-soul. I turned to the student-didn’t even try to “dig out the story,” and just said. “Got you–it’s okay, it’s all a prank!”

I haven’t had so much fun since I photo-shopped the title of one of my students’ manuscripts-in-preparation on top of a published article in a top journal and printed it out to show her we’d been scooped… But that’s another story for another time.

For those of you students soon to graduate: it ain’t over ’til it’s over…

Posted in humor, research, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Separating science and religion

When I was an undergraduate student in Jerusalem, I held a part-time job and worked full time in the summer one year as a bellboy and doorman at the Jerusalem Sheraton-Plaza Hotel. The multi-faceted experiences that I had could probably provide fodder for a couple of novels, but I want to focus on one specific issue.

More than anywhere else, this job exposed me to the ridiculous nature of extreme religion. For those of you who may not be familiar, orthodox Jewish religion forbids work on the Sabbath. For a bellboy at the hotel (working of course on Sabbath), this presented some very interesting scenarios. First, how is work defined? By many orthodox Jews, one cannot ride an elevator on the Sabbath. Why? It is the act of pushing the button for the floor that is the problem, because everything else is automated. So the elevators on Saturdays were set to be “Sabbath elevators.” This means that they would automatically stop on every floor. It could take a full 20 minutes to get up to the 21st floor.

But many orthodox would not even step into a “Sabbath elevator.” No–they would take the stairs (Less work? Go figure). But sometimes it was necessary to bring a small child or baby up to the 17th floor. Hence–the job of the bellboy. Of course, there would be no tip at the end of the climb–after all, no money on the Sabbath. In addition, the good people would always ask and check whether I myself was Jewish–after all, it’s a sin to cause another Jew to work on the Sabbath. But that “check” was inevitably done after I had climbed and sweated 19 floors with a loaded pram.

There are many more “rules and regulations,” but I think I made my point as far as giving many of you a taste of them so that you will feel my pain when I introduce the article below describing how money that should have been designated for support of scientific research is being slated for nonsense research. It hurts me, it really does. When I graduated from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, I believe it was still ranked in the top 20 in the world for the sciences. That number is spiraling upward, unfortunately, and mainly due to the hyenas feasting on the dying universities as described below.

Israel funds courses on ties between Jewish law and science

Program, funded by the Science and Technology Ministry, is drawing fire from academic quarters for not being science based.

By Or Kashti

The Science and Technology Ministry is continuing to fund enrichment courses for the general public on the relationship between science and Jewish law (halakha ), according to a tender published last week inviting groups to apply for grants. The tender stipulates that bodies applying for the funding must be those dealing with “halakhic-scientific research” and in finding “technological-halakhic solutions.”

The ministry is to grant NIS 600,000 in funding to this year’s programs, less than last year’s NIS 1 million handed out.

The program is drawing fire from academic quarters for being less scientific and more Jewish law based.

“This is not activity to promote science, but rather funding of a halakhic discussion of science,” said Prof. Sivan Toledo of Tel Aviv University’s School of Computer Science.

Other academic officials said that at a time when the humanities and the natural sciences are having difficulty surviving for lack of funds and other reasons, the decision to fund such programs was not the right one.

A source in the Science and Technology Ministry said its Minister Daniel Hershkowitz (Habayit Hayehudi ) is advancing a policy of “bringing the community closer to science,” and to that end “he obtained funding of approximately NIS 7 million, out of which NIS 1.2 million have been allocated to the subject of science and halakha.”

According to the tender, “there is also importance to the area in which science and technology are incorporated in applied halakha over the generations” and that the funding was for programs that would combine “the study and application of science/technology in relation to laws by which Jews are commanded to act.”

The call excludes yeshivas and kollels for married men unless their aims include research in the field or “solutions in the area of science, technology and halakha.”

The Science and Technology Ministry said on Thursday that the invitation to apply for the funding was formulated together with the Justice Ministry.

The ministry also said groups studying the shmita agricultural sabbatical year would also be excluded from applying to avoid double dipping, because “such research is funded by the Agriculture Ministry.”

Last year, six institutions received grants for more extensive programs, totaling NIS 1 million. Among them the the Torah-science college in the settlement of Ma’aleh Levona, the Institute for the Study of the New Month in the Kerem B’Yavneh Yeshiva and the Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halakhic Research of Shaare Zedek Medical Center.

Issues raised in the classes included the use of electricity on Shabbat, the place of astronomy in halakha and continuing education for rabbis on the issue of clinical death and transplants.

The ministry funds other programs promoting science, some more extensively than the science and halacha programs, such as science programs in local councils. Those get NIS 3 million, while other programs, like ones involving outer space, get NIS 300,000.

The Science and Technology Ministry said the tender was “augmenting, not detracting from” the ministry’s ongoing activities promoting science and was one of many such tenders promoting science.

Posted in research, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Advice on taking advice

Last week I pontificated wrote about my views on the traits that are necessary for a scientist to survive and indeed thrive in today’s world. And while there seems to be agreement that “luck” “fate” and “opportunity” are certainly useful for scientists, I sensed a lot of support for my premise that resilience and resurgence play a far greater role in the success of a scientist.

I would like to now address another trait that I reckon is also of great value to scientists (and other professionals as well)–the ability to properly handle criticism.

Sounds easy, right? But I can tell that it isn’t–certainly not for a lot of budding scientists that I’ve met and counseled.

What kind of advice can I proffer on taking advice?

First, it depends on who/what is giving the advice. Perhaps that should be lesson number one: Career advice should be seriously considered proportionally to the seeker’s respect for the advice giver. So if you are searching for an experienced faculty member to delve out personal advice, if this person strikes you as someone fair and honest, you would be wise to carefully consider her/his opinions. Particularly when the advice-giver in question has not sought you out, and doesn’t really have anything to gain or lose whether you take the advice or not.

This all sounds trivial, but I have watched over and over as students, post-docs and early stage faculty members ask for advice and then willfully ignore it, because they know better–or think they do. Perhaps this is true, but based on the outcomes of most of these cases, it sure doesn’t seem that this is so. Why bother courting advice if one plans to ignore it anyway? This is not resilience, but usually a form of egocentric behavior (that perhaps might be self-serving somewhere later along the career ladder, but not at this stage).

Learning to take advice or listen and learn from others is an essential part of being a scientist. Scientists need to be open to learning new things–technical science tricks, better ways to manage and motivate co-workers, better ways to delegate responsibility and manage budgets. There is always new learning going on. And a good scientist needs to be open to learn from her/his juniors as well as seniors. I may learn different things from senior scientists and pre-doctoral students rotating in my lab, but it is all part of the same process. Picking someone else’s brain–whether it’s to save time because a student can show me some computer tricks, or a senior investigator who has scientific ideas for me–in either case is crucial to my development as a scientist.

Second, I would suggest distancing oneself from the advice for a short time. I am not a procrastinator, but for decisions that don’t need to be made instantaneously, a short period of waiting to remove residual emotional involvement can prove useful. As an example, take a common situation for scientists–the rejection of a manuscript by a journal. At first read of the critiques, there is often frustration mingled with disappointment (Dare I say dismay? Disgust? Disillusionment? Disenchantment? Detachment? Dismissal?). However, shoving the critiques into a desk drawer for 48 hours, at least in my case (until my prescription for valium can be renewed) sometimes has the effect of focusing me and allowing me to sift through the critiques to identify the really useful and helpful comments and separate them from the spiteful ones that were made to utterly destroy my career and any future propoects and drag me down to the bottom of the….  Excuse me (*as he fills his paranoia-pill-prescription*), let me get back to the point.

Third, while I noted earlier the importance of learning to be able to “take advice,” it is also important to know when not to take advice–or at least to be wary of taking advice. Mentors who have shown that they do not hold the best interests of their students and post-docs at heart already warrant a wariness with regards to advice. Particularly if that advice goes against that of other less involved persons. Always question the motive of the individual giving the advice (warning: not to her/his face, of course).

And then there are lessons learned from experience. Years ago when starting out as a relatively green PI, I had a paper rejected from a scientific journal. The advice given in the critiques was that the paper was too narrowly focused, and that a broader perspective was needed. Rather than carefully examine the criticisms, I decided that the reviewers must be correct, and embarked on a radical plan to satisfy their concerns. But upon submission to another journal (after 6 months of hard work), the new paper was rejected for being too diffuse–of course by different reviewers. The paper that was eventually published was very similar to the original submission (albeit in a higher impact journal). So the moral of this little story is that one shouldn’t take advice blindly, either.

I have rambled on enough with this blog, so I will conclude in saying that if you don’t take my advice, don’t blame me if your careers crash like the Dow Jones Index.

Posted in Education, research, science, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Advice on taking advice

Resurgence and Resilience

There’s nothing like nature on a fine weekend to revitalize oneself after a rough week in the trenches laboffice. This weekend, we began Friday evening with a trip to the Neale Woods observatory to view the night sky telescopically–in particular to watch the Perseid Meteor showers.

Presentation first, fighting the mosquitos and watching the showers later

Apparently, our earthly orbit brings us into contact with the dust trail left by the Perseus comet about once a year. Despite the bad luck of a full moon competing for the night sky, we did see half a dozen meteors. Not exactly a shower, but even the drizzle wasn’t bad. We also had the benefit of a beautiful telescopic view of the moon, Saturn and its rings, and Arcturus, a very bright star in the northern hemisphere. In addition, a naturalist-guided night hike made this a unique experience.

On Saturday and Sunday, I returned to one of my very favorite haunts–one about which I had written about recently in sadness: Lake Zorinsky. After the lake was drained to try to save it from an invading species–the zebra mussel–as an empty mudpot it became a rather unappealing place to walk. It even smelled of rot.

In walking around the rapidly returning lake, I began thinking about one of the issues that has recently been discussed on OT–in particular, what makes a good scientist? Or perhaps more accurately, what makes a scientist good.

I reread Athene’s fascinating blog and the threads on “Do scientists believe in luck?” Coupled with a growing number of gripes that appear–particularly in recent threads–about “lack of luck” ruining young researchers careers, I felt that the time has come to issue my own view of what is the key element needed for a successful career in science.

“Luck,” “fate,” “being in the right place at the right time”–these are certainly things that can advance one’s career. But there are numerous scientists out there who complain about not getting those opportunities, and my experience is that a good number of them wouldn’t recognize these opportunities if they presented themselves on silver platters. In many cases, I think that the inability to recognize scientific opportunities and turn them into significant findings often point out researchers who may be in the wrong career jobs.

No, I have firmly come to the opinion that the number one criterion for being a successful scientist is similar to that of being a successful lake: Resurgence & Resilience.

Every scientist I know takes “knocks,” loses grant funding, has papers rejected. The successful scientists are the ones who don’t moan about it (at least indefinitely–we all moan and complain, that’s natural)–but rather, they are the ones who know how to pick up the pieces, to find the light at the end of the tunnel and come back with a vengeance.

It is easy to complain about “being unlucky,”–that rather absolves researchers of the need to be smart, focused, efficient, accurate and determined. Generally, I don’t buy it. Researchers who have the above-noted traits and are resilient will succeed. I just know it.

Lake Zorinsky in west Omaha, resurging recently.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Education, research, science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Frequent Flyers

Somewhat upset by the expensive airline tickets I recently purchased, I decided to post on some of my favorite frequent flyers seen recently in our backyard.

The House Finch--spoiled by the garden feeder

 

These black-capped chickadees have a very pretty song

 

Despite his/her size, this Blue Jay is very shy and flies off as soon as I take out my camera

 

I've not seen many of these--called Papillio glaucus (Eastern Tiger Swallowtail)

And finally, someone who looks like he’s just completed a rather lengthy and complicated experiment in the darkroom:

The Northern Cardinal.

 

 

 

Posted in science, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Egocentric and Eccentric–scientists and politicians

Scientists are well known for the eccentricity. Bill Bryson’s wonderful book “A Short History of Nearly Everything” gives some wonderful accounts of the scientists whose seminal findings these past 400 years are the basis of modern science. As one example, he describes the brilliance of Lord Cavendish, a man who was on the one hand so shy that he could not tolerate direct eye contact with other people. At the same time, he was so consumed with scientific curiosity, that to find out what would happen, he electrocuted himself gradually with higher and higher voltage until he passed out repeatedly.

To be honest, I have some stories of modern day scientists who could easily compete in the eccentricity olympics, but since I like my job, I had better keep them to myself.

Scientists are also well known for their egocentricity. No surprise there. Just like politicians. Which reminds me of a favorite joke about an extremely egocentric and puffed-up Israeli politician and former foreign minister whose name was David Levy. He was famous in his day for his righteous indignation and puffing up like a blowfish or Great Frigate bird when feeling belittled.

There were numerous jokes about the fact that this poor man never learned English, yet served as foreign minister and always had to have everything translated for him. Jokes surfaced rapidly, most of them silly little word plays: When he frowned, someone asked him, “What’s the matter?” The answer, “About 3 meters.” And so on, ad nauseum.

One joke that I did like went as follows:

One day David Levy walks into a bar and sits down. The man on the bar stool beside him leans over and says, “Hey, you want to hear a joke about David Levy?”

Levy puffs up his cheeks and points at his chest, “I’M DAVID LEVY!”

“That’s alright,” says his neighbor, “I’ll tell it to you slowly.”

Posted in humor, research, science | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Chile-ing out–part 2

As we here in the American middle west gear up for another heat wave, with heat indices slated to range from 105-115 deg. F (due to the unusual humidity), I thought that I would share another few images of my 1996 trip to southern Chile, during a 6-week break from my Ph.D. research.

Villarica volcano at night. This photo was NOT taken by me, but is from a postcard and was taken a year prior to our climb.

Having got through the demanding but exhilarating Torres del Paine circuit route in southern Chilean Patagonia, we flew north to Puerto Montt at the southern tip of the Chilean Lake District. On a previous trip coming from the south, I had taken a freight ship that navigated through the beautiful Magellan Strait and Golfo de Penas areas. The boat itself was less beautiful, and I had slept on deck in winter clothing and sleeping bag to avoid sea sickness. The ferry had been full of trucks hauling sheep, and occasionally one would hear a splash as a sick animal was tossed overboard. Not a fun voyage.

But back to 1996. We spent some time traveling on the pastoral island of Chiloe, and then began to explore the Lake District. One of our goals was to climb the Villarica volcano (see above), one of the many and active volcanoes in this area.

One has to understand that this volcano had frustrated me years earlier. I had waited 5 days in the town of Pucon, just under the volcano, for the weather to clear. I never even got to see the volcano!

Now this is a dangerous volcano to climb, although it does not require any technical skill. In fact, a number of travelers have been lost or killed–primarily because of their insistence in not taking an experienced guide, or failing to listen to the guide when he warns that the climb must be aborted due to inclement weather.

However, for those who follow the the guide, it is primarily just an arduous climb, especially for an over-the-hill scientist (and that was 15 years ago!).

The path up the Villarica. 3 steps forward, and slide back two...

This is what we encountered for the first 3-4 hours, with some attrition on the group due to blisters and muscle spasms.

Then we got to the edge of the glacier.

Preparing for the glacier. The ice pick may have saved my life later on.

Up we went, and at first the going was actually easier than the sandy terrain.

Zig-zag up the glacier. The guide did this every day and was aware of every nook and crevice.

Higher and higher.

Wide arcs were followed so that falling stones and rocks don't hit the climbers below

Scary crevices were easily navigated by the guide and his dog.

 

Anybody in there? I'll pass, thanks.

On up we went.

The peak now in view gives a much needed motivation.

Near the summit, the view down below of the Lake District was phenomenal.

In order to get views like this, you need to put in some effort.

As you can see, close to the summit, the ice is gone. Why? Because of the active volcano and the lava flowing 100 m into the crater.

The hellfires below.

The sight was mesmerizing, with the red hot lava coming in waves and roaring like an ocean as it would hit the sides of the crater. The smell of sulfur was overwhelming.

Going down was surprisingly easy, and after 7 h up, took less than 90 min. to get down.

Back to my tent and my 1996 fancy remote control camera.

In the non-digital/non-electronic age, we were so much more resourceful...


Posted in science, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments