Hockey pool, week 11

HOckey HOckey HOckey, it’s the Christmas pool update!

Many thanks to Santa’s little helpers Beth and Bob for hosting the week 9 and 10 updates, respectively. Now, what happened this week?

Well, I kicked ass, for starters! This is the third time in four weeks that I’ve had the top (or joint top) score for the week, and I’m back near the top where I so clearly belong. Lavaland and Ricardipus also had strong weeks and managed to maintain their overall lead over me; pool leader Modscientist, on the other hand, had a bit of a rough week and is grimly hanging on to a one point lead as the chasing pack bays for blood.

In the middle of the group, ScientistMother’s random picks didn’t work out so well, allowing Bob, Gerty, Chall and me to pass her. Meanwhile, Beth and Mr E Man continue to fight for the bottom of what they seem to have mistaken for a diving pool; Mr E Man is currently winning.

I don’t imagine anyone will want to host next week’s update given the proximity to the holidays (please speak up if I’m mistaken!), so who wants to host a double update on or around New Year’s Eve?

Posted in hockey pool | 12 Comments

Stand and deliver

(Warning: possibly unreasonable rant follows. But I’m too annoyed to care if it’s unreasonable! So there!)

‘Tis the season for the arrival of exciting parcels from distant lands! There are three such deliveries sitting on my kitchen table, waiting to be packed up with all our other stuff for our upcoming trip to spend Christmas at Mr E Man’s sister’s place. All were sent from the UK via Royal Mail and Canada Post, and all were left discreetly by the back door (which is hidden from the back alley – you’d have to come through a gate, cross the full length of our garden and climb a flight of stairs to be able to see it), with a parcel delivery notice pushed through the letter slot in the front door to alert us to their presents presence. Easy peasy, no muss no fuss no hassle.

However, other recent deliveries have not gone so smoothly.

The first instance involved a parcel delivery notice stuck to the outside of our front door. Yeah, thanks – just alert everyone on the main road we live on that we’re not home. Lovely. Unfortunately, since I keep my bike in a storage area at the back of the house and Mr E Man had parked his car in the back alley that evening, we both came in the back door and didn’t see it. A second notice was left the next day, stating that hey there’s no-one home again so come on in they’d made two delivery attempts and would now be returning the package to the sender. I called the number on the slip, found that because they’re based in Ontario they’d already been closed for several hours, called back the next morning, found out that the depot is located at the far side of Burnaby and is only open 9-5 Monday-Friday (thus making it impossible for either Mr E Man or I to get to without missing work), agreed to pay the $10 redelivery fee, had my credit card declined, called my bank, found out that the previous evening’s rapid switch from amazon.co.uk (sister’s Christmas present) to amazon.ca (Ricardipus’ prize gift certificate) had triggered a hold on my card, got my card unfrozen, called the courier back and re-explained the situation to a new agent, paid the $10, signed the sticky form, left it stuck to my front door for the courier (again, signalling to all passersby that there was no-one home), and finally got my package that night.

It turned out to be a book worth $15, unwrapped, and with no note saying who it’s from; all likely candidates deny all knowledge. Weird.

The second example involved a standard Canada Post parcel delivery notice, saying that the item had been taken to the nearest post office rather than left by the back door. This is very unusual and has, in the past, signified that we’ve been sent a really large parcel. Now, our nearest post office is about a 20 minute walk away (you can take the bus, but you have to go in the wrong direction for a while and then usually wait at least ten minutes for a connection), in the opposite direction to work, and is open 10-5 Monday-Friday and 10-2 on Saturdays. I had full-day commitments for the two Saturdays that fell in the pick-up window before they would return the parcel to the sender, and so I asked Mr E Man to get it for me. This is usually fine – same surname plus proof of address has enabled us to pick up each other’s stuff in the past. But this time he was refused – photo ID and a signature were required, and no they couldn’t tell him what the package was. This meant that I had to arrange to come into work late one day, and walk down there in the rain (I thought the parcel might be too big to fit in my bike panniers). After a long wait in the line-up and then for them to carefully inspect my ID and find my item, I was handed…

…a perfectly normal-sized envelope, with a Hudson’s Bay Company logo on the outside.

On the long slow bus ride back to work, I opened the envelope. The letter inside stated that due to new federal credit card regulations, HBC needs to verify all cardholders’ identities. The whole rigmarole of making very inconvenient arrangements to pick up the registered letter was just HBC using Canada Post to verify people’s identities: to get the letter telling you about the next step to keep your account active, you must have had to show proof of identity to a Canada Post employee. This winds me up no end – why is a private company allowed to use public employees to save itself the time and money it would take to check customers’ IDs themselves?! (Maybe this is a perfectly common and normal practice, but I’ve never come across it before). Why is the burden on me (and my friendly local postie and post office operators) rather than on the Bay?! It actually would have been far, far less inconvenient for me to be able to walk into the credit office in any Bay store (there are two very close by, and I’m in one of those two malls at least once every two weeks) at a time of my choosing to present my ID, rather than to have no choice but to take time off work on a weekday. I think at the very least they should have called ahead to explain the process to their cardholders, or to give people the choice of which method to use. I mean, what about working people who live way up in the north of the country, or in other remote areas far, far away from the nearest Canada Post outlet?!

There has to be a better way…

Posted in Canada, personal, rants, shopping, whining | 17 Comments

Dockin’ Around the Christmas Tree

Upon hearing that Mr E Man and I will be heading to his sister’s house for Christmas and therefore don’t have a Christmas tree at home this year*, our friends invited us round to their place on Friday to help them decorate their tree. As their two-year-old daughter “helped” by climbing on her Dad’s back while he lay on the floor trying to connect the lights, I started to sort through their huge box of assorted ornaments. And look what geeky vintage childhood delights I found!

Light-up space shuttle - note teeny tiny space walking astronaut on the plug that goes into the light socket!

Amazingly enough, the "hear Spock's voice!" button still works!

We didn't put this one up because, well, two spaceships per tree is enough, really...

This one also stayed in the box, to protect it from passing toddlers. Maybe next year.

I think we did a pretty good job:

It is a shame not to have our own tree this year, but at least I put all the lights up and wrapped various objects in tinsel. And in just over a week, weather and road conditions permitting, we’ll be pulling up in the driveway of a house nestled in a proper Canadian winter wonderland, with a beautiful tree and lots of excited family members to welcome us!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*when we’re home for Christmas Day itself we always get a real tree, so we don’t have a fake one lying around that we could put up. Besides, the cats do enough damage to it when we’re there to keep an eye on them… with our tenant looking in on them only every second day, we’d probably get home after Christmas to find the tree and all ornaments completely destroyed!

Posted in family, personal, photos, science, silliness, sport, television | 10 Comments

Occam’s Birthday!

Happy First Birthday to Occam’s Typewriter!

And what a great first year it’s been! Having left Nature Network in July 2010, I was delighted when the December 9th, 2010 birth of our very own blogging network reunited me with my old NN friends Richard (who’s also responsible for setting up and running OT), Jenny, Stephen, Erika, Kristi, Steffi, Henry, Frank, and Austin (plus Heather and Ricardipus in the Irregulars!). I was also delighted to meet Athene, Sylvia, and Steve as they joined the family, and to meet the new commenters who’ve wandered over to my blog from other parts of the network over the last year. I’ve really enjoyed reading everyone’s posts over this first year, and I think between us we represent a very diverse set of experiences and voices. Plus it’s just so much nicer to be part of a group of old and new friends, in our own space, with no external constraints on our blogging or commenting…

The blogging highlight of the year actually happened offline, when on a trip home to the UK I finally got to meet some of the other OT bloggers (plus old friends Bob and Eva from the NN days too, of course!) I hope we’ll repeat this happy occasion many more times in the future, with the whole of the group included; I’ve yet to meet Kristi, Steffi, Austin, Heather, Ricardipus, Athene, Sylvia or Steve, which is just criminal, really.

It’s much harder to choose the online highlights; it’s all just been so much fun! I could mention all the useful advice and moral support my readers have provided, or the great political discussions we had around the time of the Canadian federal election back in May, the ongoing hilarity of the hockey pool, the discussions of PhD degree structure and thesis writing, the heated debates about cycling and other hot topics… but ultimately I think the post I most enjoyed writing was “How to impress your friendly local manuscript editor“, while my favourite comments sections grew out of the “Mal-entines Day” and “Geeky Grossness Gauntlet” posts. I know you’ll all have your own favourite posts and comments (GO AND VOTE!) from this blog and from the network as a whole, and I hope you’ll share them in the comments!

I can’t wait for Year Two!

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, OCCAM!!! I raise a glass in your honour!

IMG_1540

Posted in blog buddies, meta, photos | 33 Comments

Third Annual VWXYNot? Readers’ Choice Comment of the Year Award!

So as regular readers know, every Friday, more or less, I choose my favourite comments from this blog (and my favourite posts I’ve read on other blogs), and list them in the sidebar under the title Bragging Rights Central. In December I go through the archives, tally the wins (congratulations again to Ricardipus (most mentions for best comment) plus Massimo, Nina, Beth and Henry (joint most mentions for best post)!), pick my 12 favourite comments of the year, and let my readers vote for the winner.

This is no easy task – I’m lucky enough to have some amazingly funny and insightful commenters, and it’s sometimes hard enough to choose the best comments of the week, let alone the whole year! I had to cut some really, really great comments from my “short” list of 48 (!!!), and as always I’m really sorry not to be able to include everyone.

This year’s 12 choices are below, and you should can click through to the original posts to read the comments in context.

But first:

THE RULES

  1. All regular and irregular commenters and readers are encouraged to vote! Lurkers, this includes you – and why not delurk at the same time? 😉
  2. Please vote using the poll ONLY (link at the end of this post). Any votes cast in the comments on this post, on Twitter, Facebook, other people’s blogs, or by carrier pigeon WILL NOT COUNT.
  3. Please vote only once each
  4. Please do not vote for your own comment!
  5. If you’re nominated, please feel free to link through from your own blog so all your own readers see the poll. HOWEVER, please link to THIS POST, rather than directly to the survey, so everyone who votes sees all comments in full (and all the rules 🙂 )
  6. Voting closes at midnight (Vancouver time) on December 31st
  7. In the event of a tie, I will choose my favourite of the tied comments (I won’t vote otherwise)
  8. The winner will be formally announced as soon as the NYE hangover clears
  9. Prize: ultimate 2011 bragging rights AND a CAD40 Amazon gift certificate

THE COMMENTS

1) Anthony Fejes for “I think silliness in right wing material is impossible because it is essentially already a parody of a rational perspective. In fact, even making a parody of a right wing video becomes a poe, indistinguishable from the non-parody version.

[…]

It’s like religion… Have you ever seen someone threaten you with eternal damnation and hellfire while being silly? It just doesn’t make sense, and both the religious and the right are trying to do the same thing: Use fear as a motivator to encourage some behaviour.

Fear + Silly just don’t work well together.”

2) Beth for “OMG! I’m not a Capricorn anymore! I don’t even know what a Sagittarius is supposed to be like! Hopefully it will be a list of generic positive characteristics that can apply to anyone!”

3) Bob O’H for “I’m amazed you’re spending so much time working on REDACTED. I can’t imagine how you’ll get it published, though.”

4) Eva for “Gah! My longest job was my PhD, which was about a *million* years. (Six years and three months, to be precise). A MILLION!

Oh, and longest time in same place by myself was seven years. Most of aforementioned PhD, plus a year after that. Fun fact: I got Penny within two weeks after moving into that apartment, so she also lived in the same house for seven years. My cat totally beat your house record!”

5) Eva for “I’ve dated someone who showed me a powerpoint presentation about his work on the first date. That should have been a sign, but the topic was actually interesting, so it didn’t put me off right there and then. Unfortunately, his job was the only interesting thing about the guy.”

6) Frank Norman for “Of course you know the area is really gentrified when you see a restaurant open up that sells retro de-greased greasy spoon fare but at five times the price of the old closed-down greasy spoon cafe.”

7) Lavaland for “That’s falcon awesome.”

8.) Mermaid for “Similar instructions are common when trying to learn an old family recipe from my mom (who learned it from my dad’s mom), which really can’t be written down. “Add flour until it feels right” is a favourite, as is “Mix until it looks the right level of combined”. I am sure with practice I will know what it all means, but in the meantime the failed batches are depressing.”

9) Mike for “With my little monster rapidly approach 1 yr old, I’ll take romance wherever I can damn well get it. Whether that be in Roskapankki’s stinkin’
bogs or not.

I’m already regretting typing this.”

10) Nina for “It somehow reminds me of a student of my dad’s who google-translated a term-paper from (random) bits of scientific literature (English to Dutch), and also translated some of the names of people that were cited in the literature. It took my dad a long time to figure out who those researchers were that she kept citing and that he’d never heard of …”

11) Ricardipus for “It is certainly the case that Mr. Harper controls his cabinet very, very tightly, something he’s been criticized for many times (and definitely not how I’d like to see the country run). I’ve not a lot of use for Michael Ignatieff, who is sorely lacking in international political experience, and even less for Jack Layton, who I believe would promise us all personal jetpacks, free prescription drugs and resurrected dinosaur amusement parks if he believed we’d vote for him.”

12) Steve Caplan for “Mycoplasma are an essential part of animal/human cells. Since there is MORE bacterial DNA in a human than human DNA, we need to look at humans (and their cells) as symbiotic organisms–meaning that Mycoplasma are an essential component of human cells and any cell lines lacking them should be treated with suspicion.

[…]If the editor wouldn’t listen, I’d tell him/her that he/she is full of sh.., no cr…, no…Mycoplasma…”

THE POLL

Click here to vote!

Posted in competition, meta, Uncategorized | 28 Comments

2011 Bragging Rights

HURRAH!

It’s that time of year when I start going through the Bragging Rights Central archives of my favourite comment(s) from this blog and post(s) from other blogs – see the sidebar for details – trying to pick my favourite 12 comments for the annual reader vote. Expect the list of finalists and the reader poll some time next week…

..but for now, I present to you: the Second Annual VWXYNot? Awards for the Most Comments and Posts Listed in Bragging Rights Central!

As with last year, the winner of each category gets a $20 (Canadian) Amazon gift certificate, as well as 2011 Bragging Rights (Quantitative)!

NB the most recent comments and posts are currently in the sidebar but not the archives. They’ll be archived at the end of the week and will count towards next year’s totals.

First, the comments:

I don’t think the identity of the winner will be a shock to anyone who follows BRC on even a semi-regular basis, but perhaps the magnitude of Ricardipus‘ victory will surprise you as much as it surprised me! This is the most convincing win to date, in any category; Ricardipus’ comments were listed in BRC a stunning 29 times, more than twice the still hugely impressive totals achieved by Steve Caplan and CromerCrox in joint second place! Many congratulations to Ricardipus, and please email me to let me know which email address I should use to send you your well-deserved Amazon gift certificate!

I couldn’t include the following contributors in the chart without making it look ridiculous, but I’d also like to acknowledge the following commenters:

Two BRC mentions: lin, Frank Norman, Juniper Shoemaker, katebow, KJHaxton, Liz, Richard P Grant, Ruchi, Schlupp, Steffi Suhr, Thomas Joseph

One BRC mention: Anarchic teapot, Biobabbler, Chris, Dr. O, Jenny Rohn, Kausik Datta, Knutty Knitter, Kyrsten, Lavaland, LK, Modscientist, Professor in Training, Prof-like Substance, Ruth Seeley, SB, Seth, Stephen Curry, Stephen Moss, TheGrinch

A HUGE thank you to EVERYONE who commented on my blog this year! You’re all winners!

And now, the posts:

IT’S A FOUR-WAY TIE!!!!!!!!!!

Wow.

Many congratulations to Massimo, Beth, Nina, and last year’s winner in this category, Henry. However, I have to admit that I’m stumped as to what to do now! I really wish I could send you each a $20 gift certificate, but I’m afraid I just can’t afford it. Can I please owe each of you a beer instead?! I stand a decent chance of seeing Beth and Massimo* again in the not too distant future, and since I’ve met both Henry and Nina before as well, I very much hope to see you again soon too!

Of course, if you’d rather have a $5 gift certificate now than a pint later, please just email and let me know, and I’d be honoured to oblige!

As with the comments, I couldn’t include all this year’s winners in the same graph, so kudos to the following bloggers:

Two BRC mentions: Anthony Fejes, Bob O’Hara, Erika Cule, Information Is Beautiful, Kat Arney, Prof-like Substance, Ruchi, Silver Fox, Unbalanced Reaction

One BRC mention: Austin Elliott, Barbara Ferreira, Biochembelle, Dr Rubidium, DrDrA, EcoGeoFemme, Fake Science, Flowing Data, GertyZ, GMP, Hacked IRL, I Can Has Cheezburger, Jeanne Sather, Kalliopi Monoyios, KristiV, PZ Myers, Regretsy, Ricardipus, Robert Krulwich, SciCurious, Suzi Feay, Sylvia McLain, The Excitable Scientist, The Hirschey Lab, The Oatmeal, xkcd

A HUGE thank you to ALL the bloggers I read! Keep up the great work in 2012!

Right, now I just have to choose my 12 favourite comments… watch this space!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*I think I’ve actually owed Massimo at least one beer at any given time since the day we first met online… and when I finally met him in person earlier this year and got to pay my tab, he only went and bought me dinner! How inconsiderate! 😉

Posted in competition, meta | 31 Comments

A change would do you good

My involvement in the municipal election a couple of weeks ago left me with a buzz of positive energy that inspired me to keep the momentum going and get out and do something constructive again as soon as possible. Luckily for me, a Tweet about the 2011 Vancouver Change Camp (“a unique event to learn, share and connect with change makers in the city”) popped up in my feed mid-week and I signed up on a whim, despite some uncertainty about what the day might entail and what a scientist might be able to contribute to it. However, I knew one thing for sure – that I’d meet some new and interesting people!

That proved to be the case – and then some. I went home on Saturday with my wallet full of business cards and my brain positively crammed with new ideas, including some thoughts about how I might let the momentum carry me even further in the new year.

After registering and meeting my first few Very Interesting People (including one of my fellow Vision Vancouver scrutineers from my polling station the week before! Someone else recognised me by my Twitter handle – a first for me!), I joined in the opening session. This included a very thought-provoking discussion of the nature of change – the take-home message for me being that all changes come at some cost, and may shift the existing burden onto groups of people who didn’t sign up for this new direction – followed by some ice-breaker activities. I usually find such things to be somewhat cringeworthy and/or intimidating, and was cynical in this case too, but the methods they used proved to be much more effective than I’d anticipated and were a great start to the day. The same was true for the group sing-along that was used to kick off the afternoon session – surprisingly fun and effective!

The rest of the camp used the “unconference” model, in which sessions are proposed on the day by participants, grouped into categories of similar ideas, and then slotted into the schedule. I’d never attended an unconference before, but all the Science Online and other unconference posts I’ve read, and Eva’s blog in particular, had prepared me well – although not quite well enough that I wanted to join the queue of people waiting to pitch their own ideas!

There were so many interesting options to choose from, and as it happened I kept ending up in one of the smaller groups in each session. This suited me just fine though, as we were able to focus more on the topic at hand and to hear more from each participant. My first session was on the gamification of activism, i.e. using real-life massively multiplayer games to connect people with the city and with each other. One example given was an apparently quite well established game in which you run around the city centre not knowing which other people are playing and which are just going about their usual activities. Players are given a set of code phrases, with for example “I like your coat” meaning “I’ve caught you: you have to follow me and do what I say from now on”. If you happen to use the phrase on a non-player, well, hey, you just made the city a nicer and more positive place! People threw around some great ideas about involving the Vancouver public library, city archives, park board, and other organisations, and I was more than happy to add my name to the mailing list for future involvement in this officially hellafun project.

The next session I chose was on using social media in general, and humour in particular, to reach the younger generations and to get them involved in voting and other worthy activities. The guy who’d pitched the session had been involved with the excellent Shit Harper Did website, which I may have linked to once or twice in previous posts, which was very cool! Again, it was a smallish group that generated lots of great ideas, and I was even able to contribute! We were asked to provide examples of social media outreach that had worked well; one participant talked about a fundraising concert for high school students he’d worked on that had a Twitter feed as a key component of the event, so I mentioned the success of “I’m a Scientist, get me out of here” and how much our very own Stephen Curry and other participants of my acquaintance had enjoyed it. Everyone seemed very interested, and a few people (including the Shit Harper Did guy) promised to check out the website. (I also mentioned a vaguely-remembered 1980s BBC programme for kids that used a phone line to introduce a “Choose Your Own Adventure” element to the plot… does anyone else remember this?! Imagine how cool this could be if they did it now, with Facebook and Twitter etc. as the input medium! I remember that my sister and I tried to call the line a few times to pitch our suggestions for the next episode, but never got through…)

The session immediately after lunch posed my biggest dilemma. Should I go to the “keeping politicians accountable” session, a subject close to my own non-scientific interests, or to the “cancer prevention” one, to which I’d be able to contribute more confidently and with actual experience and expertise? I chose the latter, and was glad I did; it was the smallest group of the day, and (after stating up front that I work for the Cancer Agency but was there in a purely personal capacity and that nothing I said should in any way, shape or form be taken as official policy) I was able to answer lots of excellent questions from the participants. I kept apologising for dominating the discussion, but everyone told me to keep going! We talked about viruses and vaccines, genetics, lifestyle, pesticides and other pollutants, you name it – but I think the most important part of the discussion was on the difficulty of getting funding for and basing your publication record (and therefore your career) on extremely complicated, decades-long studies that involve thousand of participants. As soon as I’ve finished this post I’ll be writing an email to the person who pitched the session, who I believe has more questions for me!

Our next task was to write down a single phrase on a piece of card that summed up our impression of the day so far and our ideas for next steps. I chose something a very cool high school student had said in the social media session: “it’s all about connecting ideas with resources”. We then had to hold our cards up as we walked around the room in silence, searching for people with similar cards with whom to form a group. In this way we organically formed several groups of like-minded people for the final session of the day.

The aforementioned high school student was in my group, and was delighted that I’d chosen her quote for my card! The discussion got very intense very quickly, and unfortunately I missed the middle of it as I had to take a phone call I couldn’t ignore; when I came back to the room I’d lost the thread a little, and took a back seat for the rest of the session. However, when compiling a list of everyone’s skill sets, my contribution of “grant writing” generated audible interest, as it also had in several one-on-one conversations! Now, whether I have the time and energy to work on grants for any of the people I met that day, even if they are working on an application that wouldn’t put me in a conflict of interest situation with the day job, is another matter…

All the groups came back together for the final wrap-up session, in which we sat on the floor with paper, crayons, tape and scissors to put together a visual summary of the day and of our vision of the Vancouver of the future. I suck at drawing and completely blanked (can you spot me blanking in this photo?), but at the very last minute drew some stick figures that were supposed to represent people coming out of their own little boxes and coming together. (This was a bit rich for someone who spends 99% of her time on transit with iPod ear buds surgically attached, but whatever…) Luckily, one of our team was clearly much more artistically gifted than the rest of us, and managed to assemble our combined scribblings into something that didn’t suck!

The event ended soon thereafter, and I made my way home exhausted yet energised. I’m glad I went in with an open mind and no expectations other than meeting interesting people – the event exceeded my expectations, and I met several people I’ve already contacted for one reason or another, including one person who might just be able to help me find some good political volunteering opportunities! People who’d come in with more specific expectations seemed to have a different experience: I heard one guy exclaiming his joy that he’d just met the absolute perfect person to help him move his project to the next stage, but someone else I talked to at the end of the day seemed very disappointed that the discussions hadn’t developed the way he’d wanted, and that he hadn’t met the right people. He definitely seemed to be the only disappointed person I talked to, though!

In summary, I’m so glad I went, and hope to return next year – perhaps with a friend or two and an idea for my own session! That will all depend on what, if anything, develops from this year’s event though… watch this space!

Posted in activism, conferences, games, personal, politics, science, technology, television, Vancouver | 9 Comments

Hockey Pool, Week Gr8

FINALLY!!!!!11!!!!!!!!1!!!

What a relief – I don’t have to give up my Canadian citizenship after all!

Ricardipus also had a good week, climbing from 5th to 2nd, but not doing quite well enough to catch Lavaland. Mr E Man forgot to change his picks but still did OK; he forgot again this week, so we’ll see how that works out for him! Bob will probably blame his bad week on the grant he claims to be writing, while Beth may well be the victim of gloating karma.

I guess that might mean that I get hit next… we shall see!

Many thanks to Gerty and Ricardipus for hosting weeks 6 and 7, respectively! Bob and Beth, I believe you’re up next; please can you decide between the two of you who will take week 9 (ends Dec 2nd) and who will take week 10 (ends Dec 9th)?

Thanks!

Posted in hockey pool | 5 Comments

Things to do in ‘couver when you’re weird

These ads that appeared in my Facebook feed the other day confuse and frighten me:

I hadn’t realised that breeding grotesquely oversized kittehs was A Thing in Vancouver… or maybe that’s just what happens when you buy breakthrough peptide-based treatments from the internet…

I’m very excited to hear about this new alternative to expensive stem cells, by the way. Lord knows I’d be buying waaaaaaay more stem cells than I am now if they were just a leeeeetle bit cheaper…

Happy Thanksgiving to my American friends!

Posted in bad people, freakishness, furry friends, medicine, pseudoscience, screenshots, shopping, silliness, Vancouver | 15 Comments

Scrutiny on the count, eh?

(Long post alert! Sorry!)

Regular readers will know all about my passion for politics, a passion that was dampened only slightly by seven years of voteless pre-citizenship residence in Canada and that has ramped up again recently thanks to a federal election and Harper’s ongoing shenanigans. I vowed on May 2nd that I would put my money where my mouth is and do more than just vote (and blog about it) next time; I took my first opportunity at Saturday’s municipal elections.

Vancouver’s incumbent mayor, Gregor Robertson, and his Vision Vancouver party are the one bright spot on my political horizon right now. I have serious differences of opinion with both the federal and the BC provincial government, but have found more common ground with Vision than with any other political party at any level of government and in any country. Robertson’s been a somewhat divisive figure, but those of us who like him like him a LOT, for his leadership on environmental issues and homelessness in particular but on other topics too1. Signing up as a Vision Vancouver Volunteer was therefore a no-brainer.

I was offered a range of options, but as a campaign virgin I just didn’t feel comfortable knocking on people’s doors or calling them up. I therefore opted for the “Inside Scrutineer” role on election day itself, and signed up for the 10am – 4pm shift. I voted at one of the advance polls so that I’d be free all day on the 19th, attended a one-hour orientation last Wednesday evening, and received my polling station assignment on Friday – I’d requested somewhere close to home, and was glad to be sent to a nearby elementary school only a few minutes away by bus.

Saturday dawned cold and bright, so I wrapped up warm and headed to my station. I was lucky enough to arrive at a quiet time; I presented my form (signed by one of Vision’s candidates) to the presiding officer, received my scrutineer badge, and got signed in (I was offered a choice of either a religious oath stating that I would not attempt to view or influence anyone’s vote, or a legally equivalent secular affirmation stating the same thing, and chose the latter). I introduced myself to the four women who were cross-checking registered voters against the list for that district and handing out the ballot papers, and to the two women greeting and validating unregistered voters, and took up my station behind the first four women. They asked where the doughnuts were, and upon learning that it was my first time and that no-one at Vision HQ had specified doughnuts, they joked that they’d be gentle with me this time, but I’d better make damn sure to bring doughnuts in 2014. I quickly learned that all six women, the presiding officer, and the greeter knew each other well, having run this polling station together for the last three or four elections. Several of them had even gone to that very school and still lived just down the street!

My role was to keep Vision’s volunteer coordinators updated with the 1-4 digit voter number of everyone who’d come through my polling station; I entered the numbers in batches of five into a secure web app via my iPhone and pinged them straight to HQ, giving them real-time information on which people who’d promised to vote Vision had already voted and should therefore be left alone, and which people hadn’t shown up yet and should be called or visited to remind them to vote. This allowed them to make the best use of their other volunteers’ time. I did a lot of dashing around between the four women to see which number they’d just crossed off in the massive thick paper registers, but luckily it took a while for them to explain the rather complicated ballot to each person so it wasn’t too frantic. It also seemed that huge queues of people with alphabetically similar names kept forming at one or other of the four desks, while the other three people had nothing to do. It’d be interesting to model this phenomenon mathematically! There were also peaks and troughs in the total activity, with the lulls leaving me time to make lots of cups of tea for everyone (the presiding officer assured me that this definitely did not constitute bribery of an electoral official. Besides, they were providing the tea bags, milk, and sugar).

The whole thing was very educational, interesting, and even fun (well, fun for a politics geek like me, anyway). It was fascinating to observe the demographics of the voters (not many young people, alas), and delightful to see whole families showing up together (my parents always took us with them when they went to vote, too). In several cases Canadian-born kids were translating some of the trickier details for first-generation immigrant parents; I was also incredibly impressed to see that these four white, Canadian-born women were able to communicate that you voted for one candidate for mayor, up to ten for council, up to nine for school board, and up to seven for park board in Mandarin, Cantonese, and at least one other language. The man in charge of the ballot-accepting machine was also able to translate some of the trickier information about the capital spending plan plebiscite. Overall there was a great atmosphere of people helping each other, and everyone seemed very cheery and polite; I didn’t hear one single cross word all day, even when long lines started to form. It reaffirmed my belief in democracy, so it did.

I was the only scrutineer present for the first couple of hours, but then another Vision volunteer showed up; he’d been due to start at 2pm, but apparently the numbers I was sending indicated an unusually high turnout and they called to ask him to start a little early. Our first counterpart for the opposition didn’t show up until around 1:45 pm, and started frantically writing voter numbers onto a piece of paper; his party were sending runners around all the stations every hour or so, driving the papers back to HQ, and entering them into their computer system manually. During a break in the action, when there were no voters at our table, he asked if we were using our phones to relay real-time information – we said yes, and he looked sad. “Vision’s pretty awesome, eh?” I said; he did not reply. He also seemed jealous that someone from Vision had delivered lunches for their volunteers – in biodegradable containers, no less!2

A third Vision volunteer showed up at about 2:30pm, and since both of the other two scrutineers were set to stay until the polls closed at 8pm they said that I could leave if I wanted. I had another hour and a half to go, so I called HQ and asked if there was anywhere else they’d like to send me. I was redeployed to a polling station a block from our old apartment on Commercial Drive, so I said goodbye to everyone and hopped on a SkyTrain and then a bus, where I finally warmed up (the school gym where I’d been was unheated and it was about -1C outside. Brrrrr). I walked into a completely packed and slightly chaotic room, with a noticeably younger demographic than where I’d come from; lots of people had come down to Commercial to shop / eat / drink, seen the “VOTING PLACE” signs, and walked in, only to be told that if they weren’t local they had to vote in their own polling station close to home, not the one that happened to be next to the shops and restaurants they were visiting. Some people seemed slightly peeved by this information, but c’mon, it’s printed right onto the voter registration cards and the election guide that came in the mail weeks ahead of time!

Once I’d introduced myself I was told that there were two other Vision scrutineers there already and another new arrival standing right behind me, they had no more ID badges for us, and besides there was already someone there representing the candidate who’d signed my second form (they gave us two each, signed by two different candidates, but I’d already given up my first one). I conferred with the other volunteers, decided it wasn’t really worth my while staying, and moved on to the day’s other activities instead.

I’d been invited to the official Vision results party downtown, but had to (very) reluctantly decline due to two prior commitments. But I kept a very close eye on the results as they came in, and was absolutely delighted that every single Vision candidate was elected to office! Way to go Vancouver! Now let’s work on that dismal turnout next time… an increase from 31% to 34% is nothing to celebrate.

About that next time…

Running for office is on my bucket list, whether it’s for city council or federal parliament3. I think I’d love the job, and be good at it – not to mention the fact that more scientists are needed at every level of government. Two of Vision’s seven council candidates are scientifically trained, which is far better than the average, but I think it’s at the federal level, where national policy on issues like stem cell research is set, that scientists can make the biggest difference. I think I’ll be getting in touch with both Vision and my local MP (a good egg, who replied promptly the only time I ever wrote to him and who I also met briefly when he threw a party for all new citizens in his constituency) to see what kind of help they might need in between elections. See what’s what, get some experience, make some contacts, take on a bigger role in the next couple of campaigns…

…watch this space!

To summarise:

Step 1: volunteer at a municipal election

Step 2: ???

Step 3: be elected as a city councilor or member of parliament

Step 4: ???

Step 5: Profit! Global domination!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. He also looks great in a kilt. I’m just sayin’. But not as good as Mr E Man, obviously).

2. The pens they gave us at the orientation session were also biodegradable. But I was astonished that the juice we got with lunch wasn’t from Happy Planet – the company the mayor started, hence his nickname “The Juiceman”!

3. Several people said they’d vote for me when I mentioned this on Twitter and at Saturday night’s party! One of them even lives in my constituency! Well, he lives in my house, but hey, you gotta start somewhere!

Posted in Canada, current affairs, environment, personal, politics, technology, Uncategorized, Vancouver | 19 Comments